What is Reality?

Download PDF Version

Who wants to know what reality is? Who wants to be in touch with reality? What if it turns out that reality is not all that pleasant to think about? If reality is not at all pleasant, it makes sense that most people replace it with fantasy. Is there any harm in that? Who is to say?

To appreciate the fantasy free approach to economics, political science or for that matter any discipline it is not necessary to be in touch with reality. To truly understand what is going on in the world it is absolutely critical. For the practice of self government to continue, at least some of a country’s population must be in touch with reality. As it is, in the United States, there are not enough to enable us to survive as a free society.

I have created a Youtube channel for the purpose of mainstreaming the fantasy free concept with the hopes of generating some interest in using the approach.  The Youtube Fantasy Free Economics channel begins with one video explaining just what reality is and what it means to be in touch with reality.

If all we do is live our lives and in the end face annihilation, what is the harm in numbing ourselves to harsh realities? Lives and choices are mostly lived with reality kept at a safe distance. I cannot guarantee that that is not the best choice. It is not my choice but still I cannot produce sound reasoning to show that staring reality in the face is a better choice.

Fantasy largely replaces reality in all but a few minds. It can be argued that an individual is better off being numbed to the raw harshness of existence.  However, society as a whole is better off when everyone faces life exactly as it presents itself.

It is my estimate, and no one else’s, that only 3 percent of any population stays in touch with reality. That is not a stable number. As the number gets closer to zero than to to 3%, progress of humanity goes into retrograde.

I have explained that nature provides only one universal incentive, self interest. Hardly a soul does not believe in the imaginary incentive to serve. It is comforting to believe others like politicians are overcome by a deep desire to serve, others who see themselves as special and deserving of service. This is all fantasy. This particular fantasy is completely destructive in a democratic system because there are no saintly people with a burning desire to serve other people.

It is normal to seek comfort by believing lies. It is highly dangerous when an entire population is indulging in that practice. That is the situation we are in in the united states today.

So, while I acknowledge that there is no way to prove the average person is better off staring reality in the face, there may be great negative consequences if a significant number of people don’t do just that. Just for now, I am making an effort to convince a few folks.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Woodpiler Report   Of Two Minds   Liberty Blitzkrieg   Mises Institute   Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

(Visited 334 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments