Thinking For Survival

Download PDF Version

Thinking devoted to the task of survival is a different task than thinking as a way to create happiness. At times it makes sense to emphasize thinking for survival. Without survival  happiness is not a possibility. Without surviving somewhat above the subsistence level happiness is not very likely. Even when there is no clear and immediate danger to lives in general, you may have noticed that levels of subsistence are beginning to decline. Affluent lifestyles for the majority are becoming harder to maintain. Reversal of that trend will require, at least for a while, devoting more mental energy to the task of survival and putting the happiness quest on a back burner for a while.

Gratification comes from fantasy free thinking but it is the deferred form of gratification. It is substantial and outweighs any negatives over time but the rewards are not immediate.

This is the essence of fantasy free thinking. Here goes.

Start by understanding and accepting that:

Life in the physical sense is temporary.

Uncertainty is normal for living things and that is the the way of the world and the universe. Uncertainty can be reduce somewhat but efforts to eliminate all uncertainty and risks create more uncertainty and not less.

Basic questions have no known answers. These are questions like: What is life? What is consciousness? Is consciousness independent of life? Why are we here? Is life a gift or an obligation? These have to be accepted as currently unknown. Explanations must be treated as guesses because that is what they are.

Laws of dominance and subservience are the mechanism that determine the outcomes of human activities. Perhaps a different system that is based on love, kindness and giving would be better but the system we have is in place is what we have to deal with. Almost all people replace this harsh system mentally and conjure up a better sounding fantasy.

The average person is not in a moment by moment kill or be killed situation. For most, it is just the opposite. When the world’s population is observed as a whole, it is clear that violence, and dominating behavior are the go to methods of making gains. Generally, the larger the group is, the more corruption there will be in the group. The more centralized and consolidated the leadership is within a large group, the more corrupt the leadership will be.

On an individual level dominance and subservience is hardly noticeable. In a free society, dominance and subservience issues are settled by agreements that benefit both parties. A cop directing traffic in an intersection is in a dominant position over all the people in cars. Who would prefer that the cars be in charge? In everyday life , for most, the dominance and subservience factor become like calm waves in a still pond.

In large aggregations of people the competition is brutal. Various countries in the world are constantly trying to dominate one another. Leaders everywhere are trying to gain and use more and more power. The more power a leader acquires, the more corrupt that leader will be. Peaceful coexistence is common, just not among large separate aggregations like whole countries.  Peace that may be present in your own life does not mean peace is universal and normal.

Life in the United States is going to get very difficult. The economy is going to collapse. We can only guess the consequences to each and every person. All who are in touch with reality will be better off than those who are not.

What everyone can do is understand what it means to be poor. Any person living below the subsistence level is poor of course. Those living but absolutely unable to avoid discomfort and misery are poor. For most though, poverty is a state of wanting. Getting doesn’t actually seem to have much utility in terms satisfying a wanting obsession. It may make sense to some to look at the wanting obsession in the light of reality. Wanting, itself may not actually be that good of thing.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

 

 

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

 

 

 

 

 

(Visited 476 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dean myers
dean myers
3 years ago

Know,,no one has any idea what you are talking,about,,or at least so few !!