The Famous Hillary Clinton Cough

bSo what is up with Hillary Clinton’s health.  This is the kind of cough that comes from using crack cocaine. Human nature does not allow the great unwashed to entertain such things.  Thinking without the handicap of fantasies and euphemisms is a way of reasoning without the restrictions human nature imposes on the mind.

The Clintons have a long history of using illegal drugs especially cocaine. Very little is ever said about the issue, because it is also human nature to impose no behavioral standards at all on leaders. Leaders are above the law and ordinary citizens are fine with having it that way.

In political campaigns we deal in the present moment. Some will say things like, “You can’t say that, you have no proof.” In the present moment with respect to who is doing what, and why, no facts or available. Those who think have to rely on probabilities and possibilities.

My best estimate is that Hillary Clinton is smoking crack and that is the reason she coughs. Medical reasons for coughing carry no particular negative stigma. The cough has to be caused by something she doesn’t want people to know.

Smoking crack is not something that would bother her hard core supporters. The elite could care less what she does so long as she carries their water and lets them the use government to rig markets and extract dollars out of the overall population.

Independent voters might prefer that she not be a drug act. And that could be enough to cost her the election.


(Visited 20 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments