The Cost of a Few Kind Words

ballot_box_3192711bWhat would you give to hear a few kind words? Lesbians gay men bisexuals and transsexuals love Hillary Clinton. Afro Americans, and Hispanics love Hillary Clinton as well. Do any members of these groups ever ask themselves why?

What they get are kind words at a super high price. In all of U.S. history, members of these groups have gotten nothing out government. It is amazing what people will do for kind words.

In Hillary Clinton’s words, LGBTs and minorities are just about sacred and always belong at the head of the table. Of course, Hillary needs to count on their votes, so that she can serve the citizens she genuinely appreciates. These are members of the ruling class who pay her for representation. LGBTs and minorities are only the suckers she needs to put her in office.

Suppose Hillary is elected. If you are LGBT, your plight in the world at the end of any terms she serves will be identical or worse than it is today. Blacks and minorities will fall even further down the income ladder.  O.K., so it doesn’t cost a thing to vote. The cost is in lost time, opportunities and income due to bad government policy that is solely designed to pay folks who have political power.

Who will Hillary serve? Hillary will serve those who pay her by way of the Clinton Foundation and other avenues she has constructed. To the degree LGBTs and minorities have paid her up front they will get some benefit from her holding the office. But, these folks have not paid to play.

The cost does not stop with the suckers who support Hillary Clinton. The cost of allowing government to be used as a tool by industrialists is so high that it is impossible to calculate.

The majority of the poor and middle class don’t even get kind words. The new world order ,as some call it, is all cost and no benefits for all but just a few.

(Visited 12 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments