Stock Market Warning

Stocks will crash in the absence of a successful plan to save them.  Is there a plan? I can say this. For two years, the smart people have been drawing the public into the market. Any, chance the elite have been selling to the public throughout this period? What do you think?

When it crashes, the elite will ready. After it falls they will spend the next ten or so years buying more stock and further consolidating the ownership of equities.

In an earlier post, Expect The Announcement, I suggested that there was most likely an arrangement whereby major industries, especially big tech would be nationalized, with insiders being paid the high market value their stocks command. That makes sense, but the tech sector has been losing political power. This seriously diminishes the probability that this will happen. If techs fall fast enough, it won’t. Don’t think your lawmakers have any loyalty to any industry. They support them because they provide them with their political essence. Techs, banks and healthcare can easily be thrown under the bus and replaced with other moneyed interests.

The fact is that no one is in control of the economy or the government, no not anything or anybody.

Do expect trading platforms to fail at the most critical moments. This will be no accident. Trap the public so that the elites can get out with as little damage as possible. Also, look for online financial news sites to quit working or at least slowed down to a crawl.

I typically cite the healthcare industry to be mob owned and controlled. However, in reality, the mob controls all three branches of our government.

(Visited 154 times, 1 visits today)
5 1 vote
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 months ago

More and more, the Chinese curse ‘may you live in interesting times” seems to be coming for us in 2022. I’m still trying to prepare myself for the potential of martial law before this year is over – your “The Coming War” post really rattled me because the more I thought about it, the more it made perfect sense. Thank you for this blog, James! Yours and Martin Armstrong’s are the two I read religiously now. I hope you’ll post often in the coming days. Your insights are deeply appreciated!