Stir the Pot

stirring-pot-3063194I don’t support candidates. Candidates run for office out of self interest. There is nothing wrong with that but expecting them to immediately take the causes of those who elect them is completely unrealistic. Government provides a way for all participants to get what they want. Politicians don’t represent voters even while voters stubbornly expect them to.

This cycle I am pulling for the few who are stirring the pot. Those candidates are Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. None of these folks are good people but stirring the pot has high utility to the country right now. Pulling for is not the same as supporting.

Why stir the pot? As it is, cooperation between elected representatives, corporate elitists and the news media is solid. This arrangement is in the process of destroying the country. From now on do no expect much media coverage of Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, or Rand Paul now that two of the three have become aggressive.

Look for each of these guys to get dismissed from this point on. Normally the RNC sends out attack dogs to get rid of candidates who challenge the status quo. I am not sure there is an attack dog brave enough to go after Donald Trump. Trump is highly adept at verbal conflict. Trump also has the “trump” card of of threatening to go third party. If he does that, no Republican has a prayer.

Fascism kills and the sooner it fails the better is the chance that the country will survive. To kill off fascism early it is necessary to break up the unholy trinity of corporate elitists, government and media. Left to their own devices these kinds will mercilessly pursue their own interests until there is a revolution. Don’t forget that in the absence of constant deterrents, government and crime merge over time. Today crime controls government.

(Visited 134 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments