Replacing Obamacare the Difficulty

The American People are extremely stupid. They still believe The Affordable Care Act is about healthcare.

Who wrote the Affordable Care Act? Was it Obama? Was it a group of citizens? How about bunch of lawmakers? No one knows exactly who wrote the bill. We do know that citizens and their representatives had nothing to do with it. The bill was written by lobbyists who wanted to create a feeding frenzy for their clients. To be specific, organized crime hired the lobbyists and they bought the cooperation of both Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

How is this possible? It takes a huge level of stupidity on the part of the general population. The public still believes Obamacare has something to do with healthcare. It doesn’t. It is a bill requiring the purchase of insurance. Obamacare provides ways for the mob to extract for themselvesĀ  a portion of every dollar spent on healthcare. It also makes certain that everyone pays, rich and poor. Senators and congressmen are in a pickle because the mob has purchased their allegiance. These kinds of deals are hard to back away from.

The difficulty in replacing this bill is that all it really amounts to is theft. How do you replace a bill that thieves wrote with another bill where the same amount can be stolen and make it easier on the victims at the same time? I am not sure it can be done.

The only reason to replace Obamacare is to avoid confrontations with organized crime, which pretty much owns government. The country is better off without any law of this kind. It could take Americans years to figure out that that Obamacare has nothing to do with healthcare.

(Visited 14 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments