Politics and Animal Behavior

Download PDF Version

Human beings take pride in their sentient nature. Unfortunately when engaged in life’s most serious undertakings, thinking is dispensed with and decisions are made with the animal portion of the brain. This is all while professing the exact opposite.

How much thinking is used in making political decisions? Lets look at the evidence. When was the last time someone tried to change your mind with a well thought out intellectual argument? That is because politics is an animal brain activity. There actually is a huge reason for this. The popular notion is that government acts as an arbitrator of goodness and fairness. All people, even the brilliant and highly esteemed, are instinctively programmed to relate to government like a child relates to its parents. Mention this out loud and you will hear denial after denial. But it is true.

What is the purpose of government? The purpose of government doesn’t matter. What matters is what government is used for 365 days a year 24 hours a day.  Despite all of the lofty definitions and fancy explanations government is where people go to get what they want. When folks are doing nothing other than trying to get what they want, intellectual reasoning is a handicap. Communication in the political arena boils down to getting others to act now without thinking.  That is accomplished by appealing to the animal brain, which registers phenomenon as good, bad, dangerous etc. so that an animal can react without thinking.

The last thing someone with a political agenda wants is for folks to do any serious thinking before making a decision. Notice with the immigration issue, what you get amounts to, “Illegals bad!” or “Immigrants just like us, seeking better life……” A thinking type argument might question, how many migrants around the globe are misplaced because U.S. inspired bombings and warfare? With respect to Mexico, we might ask, how much of that immigration results from the U.S. war on drugs keeping illegal drug prices high for the drug cartels? What are the chances the Deep State is sponsoring immigration to the U.S. because those poor folks make better customers in a modern country than they do in a third world nation?

Those kinds of questions are never asked because they have no utility when the goal is to “get what I want as fast and as efficiently as possible.” In times of crisis, this changes a little. Remember how after 911, how thoughtfulness caught on for a short period of time? The thinking never lasts. During the financial crisis of 2008 the population became thoughtful briefly. Politicians rightly figured that whatever they did would be completely forgotten by the time the election rolled around. They were absolutely right. After just a few months animal behavior had completely taken over again.

I believe we are on the cusp of another crisis. What will the reaction be? That depends on the level of suffering and which socioeconomics groups are most afflicted. When suffering continues long enough actual thinking can continue for years. Remember the Vietnam War era? That was a time when thousands of family members were being killed in an unpopular war. The average person had skin in the game.

When the next crisis occurs, my guess is that there will be perhaps a four to five month period where minds are open. What we know for sure is that the public is worth far more to the politically powerful when everyone is warm, entertained, comfortable and is completely oblivious as to how what goes on in Washington is effecting their lives.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness. Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs. Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts  

 

 

 

 

(Visited 81 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments