New Dynamics For Ruling The World

Download PDF Version                                                                          July 17, 2019

Confusion abounds when folks lose sight of the overall picture. A look at history’s long timeline reveals that for every period in every era, some entity is attempting to take over the whole world. Empire building has always been part of history. The list of Empires that have come and gone are so many, I only recognize part of the list. At any given time there is and has been at least one government so strong it has routinely imposed it’s will on the rest of the world. In just this century, we have witnessed the end of the British Empire. NAZI Germany has come and gone. The United States is the current dominant world power.

All kinds of lofty ostensible reasons are given by the citizens of whatever country is ruling the world at the time for imposing its will on the other people of the world. One reason often given for invading and conquering is that it is the best outcome for the people in the conquered country. When the goal is to rule the world, one reason is just as good as another. Imperialism is for the benefit of of the country building the empire.

In the modern era, conquering and controlling other countries is ongoing but there actually is a more effective and seamless way for the elite of the world to make slaves out of the the rest of the world’s population. Who needs to invade other countries militarily when control can be imposed much easier by controlling the worlds factor’s of production. Why go to the expense of using the military when a small consortium can decide what stocks, real estate and all other assets are worth by manipulating the financial markets?  What is the point of imperialism other than to control the time, energy, and economic activity of others as a means of profiting personally?

What we are witnessing in today’s world is a process where military based imperialism is being replaced by the belligerent control of asset ownership.

Given the knowledge that throughout history there have always been ongoing initiatives to rule the world and control others, does it not make sense that such efforts would be ongoing in the present time frame? Yes it does. It is as much as guaranteed. It also makes sense that in the effort to take over the world, the most direct and efficient method would be used. That method is, to take control of the financial markets and decide what assets are worth independently of earnings and everything else.

The difference today is that the consortium controlling assets has no limitations in terms of loyalty to a specific country or any physical boundaries. Their goals and aspirations work to the disadvantage of all others in no fewer ways than would be the case, if the old approach of conquering militarily was used.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts Straight Line Logic

 

(Visited 985 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments