Is Hillary A Crook? Is Hillary Sick?

Is Hillary Clinton a crook? That alone doesn’t disqualify her from being president. Some of the most liked and respected U.S. presidents have been crooks. When we elect, a President, U.S. Representative or Senator are we not in fact hiring a thief? If that is so, why would Hillary not be a good president?

Is Hillary Clinton sick? Does she have rabies? Who says a president has to be in good health? Suppose Hillary starts foaming from the mouth and babbling? Can’t we all politely wait until she recovers and just let her finish?

Does Hillary Clinton have people murdered? So what if she does? You don’t know any of those people. Lots of world leaders have people killed. As long as it is not you, who cares?

Has Hillary Clinton sold out to Wall Street? Why would that matter? Presidents have been selling out to Wall Street for decades. Heck, Ronald Reagan began the practice of tampering with the financial markets. George W. Bush normalized the practice. Do you really want a president who is not controlled by Wall Street? Who else is going to control a president? Certainly not you.

Ninety percent of black voters intend on voting for Hillary. How could ninety percent of any ethnic group be wrong. Isn’t the majority always right?

If Hillary Clinton, was a bad person don’t you think the news media would tell you? After all aren’t they the ones with all the information?

People need to get over this fear of Hillary Clinton telling so many lies. Does a president not have to tell lots and lots of lies? How many presidents have you heard telling the truth? Don’t blame Hillary for being real good at telling lies just because she is a better liar than all of the others.

Yes, Donald Trump tells lies but he is not near as good at it. Do you really want a president who is a lousy liar? If you do vote for Trump. But I am warning you, Donald cant lie his way out of a wet paper sack. If you think that is bad, there is more and it is a lot worse. Donald Trump might hurt someones feelings.

(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments