I Still believe Epstein Was Murdered

                                                                                                              August 16, 2019

Years ago I was sitting in an 8th grade science class. A message was sent from the office that President Kennedy had been shot. Shortly following the investigation, it was concluded that he was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald and that he acted alone. I was 14 years old at the time. Even at that young age I didn’t believe for a second Oswald acted alone. I never believed for a second that Jack Ruby acted alone in murdering Oswald.  After many years and after so many were deemed nuts and conspiracy theorists it actually turns out that the CIA arranged the assignation of the President of the United States. These days it appears the FBI tried to rig the 2016 presidential election. Two highly esteemed United States agencies have no problem breaking any and every law they choose.

So, is your government honest today? Does it seem honest? I don’t see any honesty myself. I haven’t noticed any honesty lately. So, why should I believe medical examiners who work for the government are telling the truth. I don’t automatically believe they are doing anything other than what they were told.  How much pressure can the mob put on guards, wardens and everyone else who works at a prison? Study the history of organized crime and learn the amazing schemes they can come up with to kill people.

The strategy in these things is always the same. The incident occurs and the public has its expectations. Something like what happened to Epstein occurs. After lies are told about what happens, the media starts burying the story. In time the public conscientiousness moves on to something else. Sometimes a new incident occurs and the public’s mind is shifted to something else, like when Bill Clinton bombed an aspirin factory. Has anyone heard a story about Julian Assange lately? I wonder why? How long can we expect Assange to live?

People who coordinate these things are highly adept at what they do. So, we now have a hard core honest attorney general they say. A perfect set of people are in place to do the job of explaining things away.

It is theoretically possible that Epstein committed suicide but I have to go with the weight of evidence. So what evidence am I looking at? I am looking at years of cases where things like this have happened under similar circumstances. This may have been the most heavily foretasted death in the history of the world.

All kinds of things happen in prisons. Somebody could have been hidden in his cell while he was not in it. The guards could have been paid to go sleep while the murder took place.

One unique aspect about the present moment is that hard evidence is always lacking. There are no facts available. Based on the need of so may people to have Epstein dead, there is no reason not to expect this whole thing to be covered up. The fact the the autopsy deems it was suicide is meaningless given the level of corruption in the country today, especially in New York. The facts I have are incentives and prior behavior. Those facts carry more weight than the reports on an autopsy that may have been squeezed out of Doctors by making them fear for their lives.

My personal opinion is that it probably was Epstein on the gurney but maybe not. I am confident that he was murdered.
The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts Straight Line Logic

(Visited 353 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
drjh
drjh
2 years ago

i was surprised he lived long enough to be arrested and arrive in prison