How Stimulus Destroys An Economy

How Stimulus Destroys An Economy PDF Version 

The concept of stimulus as it is practiced today began with John Maynard Keynes’s General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Keynes is frequently described as a great economist and by some even the greatest economist who ever lived.

He was in fact of great mathematician but in no way was he an economist. He had no clear understanding of markets and held the same naive beliefs about markets as do countless uneducated and wishful thinking members of the general public.

The most common naive belief about free markets is that when a business or industry becomes unprofitable absolutely nothing will emerge to take its place. Free markets provide an optimum in income and production for members of all income classes. Even though there is a 100% chance better and stronger businesses and industries will emerge, allowing that to happen requires a leap of faith, because there is absolutely no sign that new enterprises will spring up and generate new and greater economic opportunities. So, initiatives to have government save what is failing abound. Businesses which fail do so for good reasons.

The one thing Keynes got right in his work was the necessity of complete objectivity in implementing stimulus plans. This was Keynes’s straw man concept. This was his name for a totally objective, non-political person to be in charge. Does nature provide this type of individual. If you find just on example in all of history, please advise me who that person was or is.

If total objectivity is necessary with fiscal stimulus, it is also necessary in monetary stimulus. Both styles of stimulus are hashed out politically. Both monetary and fiscal stimulus serve as political tools. What are politicians going to do when they believe increasing government spending is good for the economy? Beginning with the Reagan administration stimulus is now applied no matter what.

Any stimulus program requires an economic forecast. Please provide a list of forecasts by credentialed economists that turned out to be more accurate than those of the same numbers of astrologers. When you find a few, which you won’t, I will rethink my view of forecasts by economists. If any stimulus plan is to be implemented, is a good forecast unnecessary? If a good forecast is not possible, is there any reason an economy needs to be stimulated even in a case where a macroeconomic theory calls for one. Should stimulus be applied even though no one has any idea as to what will happen next? You decide. I have already decided. Show me where I am misguided. Should congress apply stimulus, just in case the economy gets weak when no one is looking?

Monetary theory had already been debunked as an economic remedy prior to the 70s. I still remember a professor from that era explaining to the class that monetary policy had great promise but in actual practice, it produced no worthwhile results. Monetary theory was rediscovered and has reemerged as a political tool after the turn of the century.

Today both fiscal and monetary stimulus are political tools. Both are used to reward powerful interests which support the essence of politicians who administer favors as a means of gaining and retaining power. Both are very effective in that regard and are used for that purpose.

The effect of both is to create a huge income gap between the working poor and the wealthy. Who benefits from stimulus? The beneficiaries of stimulus are the parties with enough political power convince congress to spend in support of what they have to offer.

After forty plus consecutive years of stimulus, resources in the United States are allocated grossly inefficiently. The economic viability of the poor and lower middle class have been destroyed. So, the economy is collapsing. Since the free market system has been replaced by stimulus inspired socialism where benefits go to the top, there is no way the economy will recover from the severe depression we are entering.

Drinkin’ Beer & Suffering MP3

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics Recommends the Following Blogs

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts Straight Line Logic




(Visited 184 times, 1 visits today)
5 2 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Impressive neighbor