Hope Of A V Shaped Recovery

Hope Of A V Shaped Recovery PDF Version

I will explain very briefly why a V shaped recovery is not possible.

Think of the economy as being like a wall mirror that has fallen to the floor and shattered. The mirror can be put back together by gluing each and every piece back together but it won’t function very well as a mirror. It works the same way with the economy now that it has been shattered. It won’t be the same. It won’t be better. It will be a shattered centrally planned economy with few free market influences to set it upright,

The economy that has collapsed is the product of 40+ years of aggressive central planning. That guarantees that the economy would collapse at some point. Central planning in the United States constitutes economics in retrograde. Central economic planning can be increased or decreased. Given the mindset of rejecting both free market and democratic principles, more central planning will undoubtedly be initiated.

Stimulus of some kind will be used. What is wrong with stimulus? Aggregate economic theory has adopted Keynes’s concept of a straw man. By straw man,  Keynes addressed the necessity of having a 100% objective, non-political, unbiased person implementing central economic planning. The straw man is only a product of the imagination. No such entity exists in the Universe.

To justify central economic planning efforts also requires the adoption of the incentive to serve  on the part of all involved. In the entire world, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve at the aggregate level. There is in families and friendships but on the aggregate level that doesn’t apply.

There needs to be a halfway accurate forecast. To date, economists are not capable of making halfway accurate forecasts. If they can, please provide some examples. But, one is not enough.

So, when the economic crisis is addressed by government, based on no reliable forecast, the efforts will be blind from the beginning, as they always have been.

What we will get is a plan that benefits those with enough political and economic power  to central plan in ways that save and enrich them. This is the path that followed the 2008 crisis, This is the only path there is, so it will be used.

Americans do not know who their government is. As I say, an entity is the function it performs, not the name or definition it is given. Americans assume that the government they elect is what causes this, that or the other to occur according to the will of the electorate. However it is clear that the will of the majority never makes its way into political power. The government that really determines what the formal government does are those with enough wealth and power to make it turn out to their benefits. So, the class that I refer to as the 100 richest are really your government. They own the media so you hear and see what is to their benefit for you to witness and not yours. Your government really is the group that controls government policy, not what is in Washington.

It is not hard to notice that the corporations with the most political influence came out very well with respect to the nation’s Corona Virus, response. The stock market is rocketing and stocks of anointed corporations are skyrocketing.

Stock prices are completely orchestrated and managed and have been for many years. When such a small number of entities own such a large percentage of equities and other wealth instruments, it is much easier to get the stock market to do the “right” thing for those in charge of the country, than folks want to think or admit.

So, given our current situation, there will be no actual recovery at all. Only free markets can accomplish that. What we may end up getting are a few government statistics that show improvement.  These, kind of statistics are always highly embellished, They just don’t mean what they are deemed to mean. Any central planning solution will further transfer wealth from the bottom of the economy to the top.

How well will the elite of the world do? A lot of that depends upon the number and nature of the lies the public is duped into believing. However they will have their own headwinds. Many successful corporations today have no utility to society. That means their success will not be permanent of anything close. One constant to economics is that corporations constantly come and go. Where are Sears and Montgomery Ward today? In the 70’s there was this saying. “As General Motors goes, so goes the country. Tastes and preferences change. What has no real utility finally disappears.

Anointed corporations will also find it difficult to sell their products and services when their customers have been destroyed.

There are good reasons for the ongoing demonstrations. Police brutality is a plenty good reason but there is general discontent in the streets not directly related to the initial incident. People respond to stress as it occurs. There will be other responses. It will be interesting to see what they are.

Iconoclast Country With Curbside Jimmy and the Underdogs.

Yes We Are The Underdogs. I Hope You Will Be Pulling For The Underdogs.

When Times Got Really Weird MP3

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts Straight Line Logic





(Visited 384 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments