Getting a Handle on Immigration

 If you want to talk logically about immigration, you will be called a xenophobe, Islamophobe, and a bigot for sure. For good measure you will probably be called a homophobe, misogynist and a number of other names even though the terms may not be related to the discussion. You have to talk about it anyway.

As I always do, I will break the immigration issue down to its barest and most relevant elements. The argument for unlimited immigration is something like, “we are nice people and nice people love everyone and let them into the country.” “You don’t want them here so you are a bigot.”Donald Trump hates Muslims and you are a Muslim hater also….blah blah blah,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

There are other factors that need to be mentioned. Immigration that consists of individuals and families, deciding to opt for freedom in what they believe to be the best and fairest country in the world, occurs at a fairly slow steady pace.  The immigration we have today is intentionally drawn in almost as an emergency.

I write constantly about the claws of fascism digging into the U.S. economy. The horrors of fascism begin at lower income levels. The benefits go to the rich and trickle down but not all the way to the bottom.  The pressure to force wealth and income to the top are enormous. Once the incomes at the bottom are gone, the next highest rung gets destroyed. While the elite get rich beyond imagination, they destroy their market in the process. The elite are not concerned with the comfort of folks they destroy. The poor spend every dime they earn. If the elite can add poor to the economy by leaps and bounds, they can have enough bodies to more than replace consumers who have lost their incomes.  The misery of the new immigrants is of no concern to them.

An added benefit is that the new poor population will be made up of people who will champion the causes of the rich.  The new poor will be ignorant, malleable and easy to manipulate. The new poor who are being drawn into the country represent a gold mine to the groups planning to manipulate their opinions and behaviors. Add the new poor to the mountain of mush who are the current voter base and it is all good for the elitists.

Question this process or object and you will be slapped with all kinds of horrible labels just like Trump is. Don’t question the process and you will get poorer everyday. I am going to let them call me names and go ahead and tell the truth.


(Visited 13 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments