DNA Of Your Betters

DNA Of Your Betters PDF Version

What are some of life’s most competitive activities? There are professional sports, pop music, business in general and so on. Is there any reason why an average person with an average of DNA based attributes cannot rise to the top in any and all of competitive fields.

There is no law against trying. Given enough effort is there any reason why Pee Wee Herman couldn’t play line backer in the NFL? Perhaps he does not run fast enough. Is he too light? Can he bench press 400 lbs? Is he competitive enough? It takes a lot to qualify as a linebacker in the NFL.  What is most necessary here is what is in a person’s DNA.

How competitive is the process of becoming the world’s richest man?

How competitive is it to become the world’s most powerful man or woman?

How competitive are elections of the president and members of congress?

The competition to be top dog on the world stage in any of the above just mentioned positions is almost impossible to even fathom because it is so severe. In truth that kind of competition gets bloody.

What DNA based characteristics would contribute to winning the presidency or a seat in congress? Some describe it as a political personality. A good question is, what is the difference between a political personality and that of a sociopath? Honestly, that is a good question. Is there a difference?

(Visited 42 times, 1 visits today)
5 2 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments