Demonizing White Folks

Download PDF Version,  YouTube

Wouldn’t it be nice if all of the world’s problems could be solved just by getting rid of all the white folks. Adolf Hitler decided that it would be good to exterminate Jews, Gypsies and some others. A lot of Germany supported his efforts. It didn’t turn out very well. Race doesn’t determine behavior. Personality characteristics are better for predicting behavior.

So, what is the motivation to demonize the white race? There are actually two different factions of socialists trying to extract government benefits out of the economy. Since truth is not used in politics, calling folks racists who are not, is absolutely normal and to be expected. Left wing socialists demonize right wing socialists as a means of diminishing them.  Both groups are competing for limited government resources. Diminishing white people by the liberal faction is an attempt to extract a larger share of national resources for themselves.  The reasoning is that resources are limited. Presenting the competition as unworthy is perceived as a way of gaining more resources at the expense of the competition.

Mainstream economists believe that it is human nature to be productive and look for opportunities to work. In the real world it doesn’t work that way. Operating on the basis that it does work that way is one of the reasons mainstream economist are always wrong with respect to economics in the aggregate.  Human beings behave the same way members of any predictor species operates.  What do lions and hyenas do when they go out for a hunt? First they look for prey that has already been killed. Often they run smaller animals off and eat their prey. Animals in groups first try and live off the efforts of others in the group before doing any work on their own. Human beings do the same thing.

What does it mean when a person is unfairly called a racist? It means the other side is working in keeping with the human herding instinct. Tribal positioning is another good term. Conservatives virtue signal. That is instinctive and amounts to tribal positioning also.

Conservatives only use the term “conservative” for effect. Based on how they use their time and energy, they are socialists, just as are the folks who oppose them. A true conservative work tirelessly to repeal laws and close government agencies. If there were any conservatives in the country, they would be working as hard to repeal laws and close government agencies as they are working to build a wall between the U.S. and Mexico. A truly accurate description of a modern conservative is right wing socialist.

The contest is not about doing right, avoiding wrong or administering justice. It is only a fantasy that government will ever do those things. It never has. Liberals are pushing classic socialism. Conservatives support top down socialism. There are no free market advocates.

Government is and always has been the place people go to get what they want and have others pay for it. White people like all other ethnic groups are competing for benefits. It is reasoned that if whites get more, all others get less.

If you are white and are being unfairly deemed a racist, just know it is for an economic reason.

It is more important though to realize that there aren’t enough conservatives in the country to be counted. So, if you are not a racist and are being called one, chances are still close to 100% that you are a socialist. I suppose it is better to be a socialist than it is to be a racist and the socialist label is normally highly applicable.  There just aren’t any free market advocates.
The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.
Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.
Woodpiler Report
Of Two Minds
Liberty Blitzkrieg
Mises Institute
Straight Line Logic
Paul Craig Roberts


(Visited 342 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments