Conspiracy Theory or Doubting The Veracity of What You Are Told?

Epstein’s body is hardly even cold and those who doubt the veracity of the developing official narrative are already being called conspiracy theorists. Personally, I don’t mind being called a conspiracy theorist. Why? The majority of conspiracy theories turn out to be true. Most that are false are those like the fake moon landing theory, and can be seen to not be true from the beginning. When news comes out, and minds go into the “what is wrong with this picture mode?, the story is generally incomplete or a fabricated lie.

The last thing any of us need is to be intimidated into accepting a dialog that is meant to deceive everyone from the outset. When was the last time you can remember there not being more to a dialog than what is presented to the general public? Doubting the veracity of what is presented to us is part of the gift of discernment nature gives us. Using that gift is optional.

The following comment is not mine. These are comments from someone who goes by AlaricBalth. and who frequently opines on Zero Hedge articles. I am publishing them because they entertain suspicions others are likely to have.

His case was never meant to go to trial. The new arrest and incarceration was part of an elaborate scheme to get Epstein, an increasingly unstable liability to certain super-elites, out of the US and into a “Galt’s Gulch” situation. 

The reason they did not kill him is because he had a dead man switch. Someone entrusted by Epstein, perhaps Ghislaine Maxwell, who would release all damning information on the elites if he was harmed. 

Speaking of Ghislaine Maxwell, why hasn’t she been arrested as yet?  It was rumored her father was an Israeli agent domiciled in England. He died under mysterious circumstances. Could Ghislaine have been the Mossad handler of Epstein? That would answer the question as to why she isn’t indicted. 

Anyway here is my alternate scenario;

The first suicide attempt, weeks ago, was “the set up”. Give people the impression that he was suicidal. After “the set-up” comes “the hook” and “the tale”. This is when the public bites on the narrative and the press perpetuates the same narrative. This short “Big Con” comes to fruition with “The Sting”, the culmination of all the planning with the new “suicide” and “the get-away”. 

Deflection and diversion is the key. 

The planners also have a “scape goat” in the Clintons, who most people assume had him  “Arkancided”.

Co-conspirators entered the cell and prepped Epstein, an alleged Mossad agent, with make-up to ashen his skin, and a ketamine anesthesia to make him unconscious and minimize his vital signs. Then they took him out in an ambulance, had a death certificate signed by a paid-off coroner, and moved him to a safe house as he awaits a flight to Israel, from which he has a passport and duel citizenship. 

He will be drinking Arak in a new Mediterranean Villa in Tel Aviv as soon as this news cycle runs it’s course in about 2 months.

There were greater powers than the Clinton’s at hand in this. 

The Windsor family and Queen Elizabeth of Great Britain, one of the most powerful families in the world, had to protect the monarchy. A one thousand year bloodline was soon to be irreparably marked in a scandal that could have brought down the crown due to Prince Andrew’s alleged insatiable appetite for young girls. 

Epstein had videos and witnesses to Prince Andrew’s and other elite’s transgressions. Had they killed Epstein, the evidence would have been dumped into the public domain. Hence, the arranged “suicide”.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics YouTube Channel

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Woodpiler Report Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts Straight Line Logic


(Visited 498 times, 1 visits today)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments