Animal Behavior In Humans

Animal Behavior In Humans PDF Version

Human beings generally are offended when animal behaviors are ascribed to them.

But, take even a casual glance, and it is easy to notice, especially in the aggregate, animal behavior is mostly what us exhibited. But, we don’t want it to be that way, right? So, the thinking brain is always assumed to be in charge. Seeing animal, or instinctive behavior can be noticed just by looking at some parallels.

Suppose a person sees a dog and wants to make use of its time and energy, in other words own it. What does a person do? He offers it a treat. With a few more treats, the dog bonds with the human and becomes loyal. The dog will then serve the human in countless ways that are worth for more than the treats. The dog will remain loyal even after a man whips it with a stick.

Suppose, Facebook want you to subscribe, so that they can make use of you as a target for advertising. What does Facebook do? It offers you a treat, which turns out to be a page where you can advertise yourself and all you do in the world.

Both dogs and humans will undergo substantial stress and hardship before giving up a treat.

Facebook can take away a human’s First Amendment rights, manage his opinions and expose him to propaganda from the state. This is abuse that rises to a higher level than whipping a dog. So, what does the human do? By no means is he going to leave Facebook. Facebook is the source of his treats.





(Visited 43 times, 1 visits today)
5 1 vote
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 months ago

Hmm, I tried to leave a comment earlier that somehow didn’t post. I’m on an old, glitchy laptop so maybe that’s why.I didn’t realize you were very ill and I’m definitely sending much love, light and prayers your way, my friend. This blog DEFINITELY needs to be read by way more people.