A Must Watch Video

The reason I am suggesting this video is that I am currently explaining that that we call the Deep State is in reality a global crime syndicate that as of the present has taken over the world. I did no research and site few facts. That is my normal mode. All I do is first view our current situation in terms of it as an outcome an outcome. There is no way that any given inputs over the years would or could generate the circumstances we are all experience today. Then I ask what inputs over the years would create a situation like we are in today.

Only a global crime syndicate which controls all of the world’s people and all resources could be responsible for creating a system where the real incomes of ordinary citizens have stagnated or dropped for while that of those in the upper upper one percent have increased over the past forty years.

The maker of this video has come to the same conclusion I have. There is no way anyone is going to be exactly right in terms of facts with respect that all that has gone on in unwritten history over the long history this video covers. Much of what is said, however is complexity valid and verifiable.

Just thirty years ago, like most do today, I dismissed these kinds of assessments as completely impossible.  Now it turns out that my end conclusions are the same is his. One of those is that the very richest of the rich are in cash and plan on using the crash in order to buy after the market has crashed as a means of taking over even more of the world’s assets and other resources to guarantee profits for themselves is far in the future as can be fathomed,


(Visited 175 times, 1 visits today)
5 1 vote
Article Rating

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.
This entry was posted in Daily Comments. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments