RETURN TO QUILLIAN & TAYLOR MAIN PAGE 

Contact 325-869-5255

webmaster@quillian.net

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Investing Long Term Using the Quillian Model 

Printable Version in MS Word

by James M. Quillian, Securities Analyst & Portfolio Manager

                                                                                                  

When the stock market bubble burst a few years back, individual investors lost millions of dollars. Long term investors were especially hurt. As the decline began investors all across the country could be heard repeating the mantra “I am a long term investor. I am not concerned when the market goes down” These words were often spoken as a means of appearing to take the high ground as if people doing the selling were being reckless.

Most investment losses can be avoided by thinking though a common flaw in the in the investment reasoning process.

More often than not, investors believe that because stock averages continue rising over time, most stocks also rise over time.  Decade after decade, stock averages have indeed continued to make new highs. The total value corporate capitalization, or stock, also continues to rise. However, most individual stocks eventually go down and never recover. Figuring this out doesn’t take a lot of analysis. Right now a stock screener on a popular web site turns up 4709 stocks that are trading below $5.00 per share. The same screener turns up 1241 stocks trading between $5.00 and $10.00, 2074 between $10.00 and $20.00 and  3153 stocks trading at over & 20.00 per share.  The majority of stocks did not start out trading at such low prices. They all traded much higher at one time.  Only a few low priced stocks will ever recover.

During the dot.com debacle, the multitudes of investors unwittingly held on to their stocks believing they were going to be rescued by the long term. The long term for the majority of stocks always has been and always will be something resembling a graveyard.

 

An investor who anticipates ahead of time that less than half of all stock purchases turn out to be profitable if held indefinitely is in a better position to put together a successful investment program than someone who does not know what to expect.  Most serious stock market losses occur not because of a lack of financial sophistication, but because of simple errors in judgment.  Quillian & Taylor suggests building a portfolio using the Quillian Model. The Quillian Model as described below provides individual investors with a a logical framework of expectations.

 

The Quillian Model

Think long term but understand what actually happens over the long term.

For the example, consider long term to be ten years.

According to the  Quillian  Model:   

Secondly, 

The Quillian  Model is not a guarantee that the future will unfold in a certain way but instead a reasonable expectation that is based on observations of stock market history. 

The exact numbers might be different from those in the example but the principle always applies. Over time, the majority of investment ideas turn out to be bad.  The successes of a few stocks, however, end up more than making up for losses incurred in the others.  Portfolio performance is greatly enhanced if the stocks that begin to falter are eliminated and replaced with new stocks which are already in up-trends.  The Quillian Model is not a ridged prescription of any kind but as a logical expectation.  In order to be truly successful, any long-term investment program must be adjusted in accordance with the simple principal described in the Quillian Model.  Stocks are good long-term investments but one must realize that a minority of stock picks turn out to be profitable in the end.  Buy and hold is the best strategy, but only when over time non-performing stocks are replaced. 

Investors are invariably hurt when they expect from the stock market more than the stock market is capable of delivering. The Quillian Model provides portfolio managers with a reasonable table of expectations. 

Often the performance of stock averages is sited as evidence that stocks are a good long-term investment.  What is never mentioned is that the stocks which make up the averages are constantly being changed. Looking at a 50 year chart of the Dow Jones industrials makes an impressive case for a buy and hold strategy. But what kind of performance would the Dow Jones Industrials have had if none of the Dow stocks of the 1930 list had been replaced?  Three stocks have been rotated out of the list just since since 1997. Look in the table below and observe how the composition of the Dow Jones Industrials has changed over time. 

Composition of the Dow Jones Industrials at Selected Time Periods  

 

1930

1956

1976

1997

2003

 

 

 

 

 

Allied Chemical

Allied Chemical

Allied Chemical 

Allied Signal

3M

American Can

American Can

Aluminum Co of A

Alum Co. of America

Alcoa

American Smelting

American Smelting

American Can

American Express

Altria Group

Bethlehem Steel

American Tel. & Tel.

American Tel. & Tel.

AT&T Corporation

American Express

Borden

American Tobacco

American Tobacco B

Boeing Company

AT&T

Chrysler

Bethlehem Steel

Bethlehem Steel

Caterpillar

Boeing

Eastman Kodak Co.

Chrysler

Chrysler

Chevron

Caterpillar

General Electric

Corn Products Ref

Du Pont

Coca-Cola

Citigroup

General Foods

Du Pont

Eastman Kodak

Du Pont

Coca-Cola

General Motors

Eastman Kodak

Esmark

Eastman Kodak

DuPont

Goodyear

General Electric

Exxon

Exxon

Eastman Kodak

Hudson Motor

General Foods

General Electric

Procter & Gamble

Exxon Mobil

International Harv

General Motors

General Foods

General Electric

General Electric

International Nickel

Goodyear

General Motors

General Motors

General Motors

Johns-Manvile

International Harv

Goodyear

Goodyear 

Hewlett-Packard

Liggett & Myers

International Nickel

Harvester

Hewlett-Packard

Home Depot

Mack Trucks

International Paper

Inco

IBM

Honeywell

National Cash Reg

Johns-Manville

International Paper

International Paper

Intel

Paramount Publix

National Distillers

Johns-Manville

J.P. Morgan

IBM

RCA

National Steel

3M

3M

International Paper

Sears Roebuck

Procter & Gamble

Owens-Illinois

McDonald’s

J.P. Morgan Chase

Standard Oil of Ca.

Sears Roebuck

Procter & Gamble

Merck & Company

Johnson & Johnson

Texas Company

Standard Oil (NJ)

Sears Roebuck

3M

McDonald’s

Texas Gulf Sulphur

Standard Oil of Ca.

Standard Oil of Ca.

Philip Morris

Merck & Company

U.S. Steel

Texas Company

Texaco

Sears Roebuck

Microsoft

Union Carbide

U.S. Steel

U.S. Steel

Travelers Group

Procter & Gamble

United Air Transport

Union Carbide

Union Carbide

Union Carbide

SBC Communications

Westinghouse

United Aircraft

United Technologies 

United Technologies

United Technologies

Woolworth

Westinghouse

Westinghouse

Wal-Mart

Wal-Mart

Standard Oil (NJ

Woolworth

Woolworth

Walt Disney

Walt Disney

Here are a few more helpful tips:

Give up naive ideas about risk. Many investors automatically assume that risk is reduced by sticking with low P. E. stocks or stocks of large well established companies. High dividends are often seen as indications of safety. No such ideas hold water when empirical evidence is examined.

Understand the limitations of  fundamental analysis.  New investors often delude themselves into thinking they know something special about a stock, and the rest of the world will eventually catch on, and the stock will go up. That kind of reasoning only works on rare occasions. The speed with which information spreads through the investment community is almost beyond comprehension. Novice investors also typically believe that insiders and professionals have superior information. They have an advantage only occasionally and in isolated circumstances. The financial realm unfolds faster than even the brightest mind can decipher information. Fundamental analysis is valuable for answering basic questions concerning the financial stability of a company, and understanding the broad scenario in which a company operates. Fundamental analysis can successfully be used to eliminate stocks from consideration. For example, if a stock is in a strong up-trend but is in horrible financial condition, it might make sense to choose another stock instead.  Fundamental Analysis will do little to indicate the future direction of a stock price.