|
January 5, 2009
The following is from the
first article that I wrote in 2008.
"I am no
longer unique in warning of a recession. Although others
are placing probabilities on the likelihood, I am
saying, as I have for about three years, a recession is
not avoidable. Three years is a long time. I am not
proud of being early. I do believe that the eventual
severity of the economic downturn will make the three
year time span of being early look a lot shorter than it
does today."
January 14, 2008
High School Economics
The United States economy
began as a free market system. The allocation of
resources through out our history has mostly been
accomplished by prices which are determined in the free
market. The minds of our citizens have been conditioned
to think that it works that way. The economic policies
that our leaders come up with are built on the
assumption that the free market system is in place and
working.
From the outset the
different players in the economy have used the
democratic process as a means of gaining an advantage in
the market place. Efforts to do this have always had a
degree of success, but when the government was small the
effect was not that noticeable. Today, success or
failure of large sectors of the economy are dependent
upon efforts to influence government policy as they are
upon participating in normal business practices. A
necessary role for government in a free market economy
has always been recognized. But, government never plays
a large role in allocating resources. That has all
changed over the last several decades.
The late Milton Freidman
always argued in favor of small government. When his
detractors warned of industrialists gaining too much
power in a capitalist system, he would warn that when
government grew in size that industrialists would take
control of government. That very thing has happened.
The policies that are
currently being implemented are designed to save a free
market system, but given the system that we actually
have, the result will be much different than what we
hope for. It is unwittingly believe by most that it is
through public welfare and entitlements that government
affects resource allocation. The ordinary practice of
influencing public policy has proved to be highly
profitable to powerful sectors of the economy that
seek to gain an advantage in the market place.

Government actions do have the potential to cause an
economic recovery. Because nothing of any structural
substance is being done, the coming recovery will just
be a predecessor to the next decline. Recessions are a
necessary ingredient for the efficient functioning of a
free market. A government that is committed to
preventing all recessions is in fact insuring the
eventual failure of the entire system.
The sheer volume of money being poured into the
financial markets is likely to spark an intermediate
term uptrend, which may be mistaken by many for the
beginning of a new bull market. The practice of
eliminating recessions creates a certainty that the
country will fall into an actual depression.
Many causes will be given for the coming depression. It
will be said that capitalism has failed. Actually
capitalism has been perverted to the point where it is
no longer self-regulating. The economic system's failure
will be caused by the corruption of the free market
system. Errors in reasoning are the root cause of an
economic failure of this kind. When the solutions being
presented are based on the same faulty reasoning that
has caused the present problems, a larger failure down
the line is imminent. When there is a clear
understanding that the system has failed due to a lack
of free market incentives, that will be the light at the
end of the tunnel.
The economic theories that are the driving force behind
current efforts to save the economy are full of holes.
America's faith is misplaced. The Bernanke/Paulson
approach will fail for the same reason a chain letter
fails to make everyone rich. Erroneous assumptions are
made as to how people will behave. For an economic
intervention to work the implementers must accurately
forecast the behavior of those on which the plan is
being implemented. What is actually happening is that
the rank and file are studying the behavior of the
Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department then
adjusting their actions accordingly.
The after effects of the last decade's experiment with
planned, hybrid free market economics and financial
market manicuring will have a negative effect on the
stock market for years to come.
Again the short term plan at Quillian & Taylor is to
enter 2009, on balance long, close long positions into
enough strength and be on balance short again before the
year is up.
James Quillian

|